web analytics
Get Adobe Flash player

Monthly Archives: May 2013

The Chicago Gangsta-style political tactics that have been prevalent through out the Obama reign are being revealed daily through the latest parade of scandals.

The corruption revealed through all the investigations that have and are to come, may not result in any major damage to Obama personally, but can damage the Democratic ‘brand’, and when the 2014 elections come around they will run from him like he has the plague.

As it stands the Gangsta-crats have implemented the greatest deterrent to participate in any Conservative, Tea Party, or Christian activity. – FEAR.

It’s a little suspicious to me that it was actually the IRS that revealed the scandal to start with – probably expecting a little collateral damage – but arrogantly assuming that the gangsta-media would run cover for them and through months of “lie and deny” would keep the tactic of fear in the minds of potential Conservative activist.

Under the pressure of the current scandal, the IRS may have to refrain from it’s previous activities but the atmosphere of intimidation and fear has already been established.

This is the time that activist groups and political campaigns solicit donations from their big money donors.

It’s common knowledge that 15 Romney donors were audited with 7 of them being accused of criminal activity.

The former head of the San Antonio Tea Party in Texas says the IRS targeting of his organization terrified so many members that nearly 50 percent quit the group.

Tea Party and conservative groups were sent questionnaires that were very intrusive if not illegal.

They asked: who was attending your meetings, what were your meetings all about, give us a list of your donors, how much money are they giving you, phone numbers etc.

Christians were even asked what they prayed about. Or what kind of books they read.

Whether or not Obama knew it, and instructed his gangsta-staff to implement this tactic—which may or may not be proved at some time, the tactics definitely assisted in the theft of a Presidential election, and aided in gained seats in Congress and additions to the Senate, thus guaranteeing their control.

And the tactic of intimidation and fear has been established and the warning has been sent that if you oppose the Gangsta-crats, they will go after you.

However, along with accompanying multiple scandals, the Gangsta-crats have provided the Conservatives with an opportunity to eliminate the IRS and big government.

The IRS is feared and hated by everyone.

Sen. Cruz recently tweeted: “Mr. President, if your #1 priority is fixing the problem, let’s abolish the IRS and ensure it NEVER happens again!”

This is the prime time for Conservatives to implement legislation that will eliminate the IRS.

The Gangsta-crat politicians will oppose them, but most of their constituents will favor the elimination, and will put pressure on them to vote for the bill.

There is the added fact that a vast majority of voters will not trust the IRS to implement Obamacare, the greatest piece of social legislation in decades.

And the AP scandal reinforces the distrust towards the  Gangsta-crat administration

This should be the number one and most intense campaign to pass legislation in our time.

Conservatives politicians at the national level must organize, write a bill, create emotional talking points and catch phrases, and then saturate the public with them, as revealed on this site. If anything can be sold to the public, this is it.

The RNC should run ads.

The local, county and state GOP organizations should encourage the national politicians to write the bill and then commit to promote it. – Also college GOP groups.

If the IRS can be eliminated it will eliminate the fear of intimidation, and will encourage voters to get involved in removing the Gangsta-crat politicians from office.

Of course this will require a different tax structure.

Following are the arguments:

Flat Tax Vs. Fair Tax Vs. Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 Plan


In 1947, in the case Everson v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court reinvented the definition of the phrase “Separation of church and state” and declared, “The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state.

This “big lie” is the most damaging legislation ever passed since the beginning of the United States.

I was seven years of age when this law was enacted, and often find myself blaming the generation of my parents for allowing the passing of this damaging legislation. Not one Christian, or Christian organization opposed it passage.

And I have to wonder how many of our children will curse us for allowing the Progressives to destroy their lives because we didn’t get involved, and demand that our nations leaders return us to laws that will promote “social morality.” – If we don’t our nation will soon die.

“Separation of church and state” currently means almost exactly the opposite of what it originally meant, and has been used to delete the mention of God or any godly activities in any public display or government institutions.

This bogus law has been used by the Progressives to eliminate school prayer, posting of the Ten Commandments on the walls of schools and courtrooms, used to block Christmas displays, Easter and any other Christian sanctioned activities, or public comment.

The “separation of church and state” phrase, which they invoked, and which has today become so familiar, was taken from an exchange of letters between President Thomas Jefferson and the Baptist Association of Danbury, Connecticut, shortly after Jefferson became President.

The Association of Danbury was concerned that the federal government might one day – as in their former country, England – might attempt to establish a government-sanctioned church, and wrote these concerns to the newly elected President Thomas Jefferson

In his short and polite reply to the Danbury Baptists on January 1, 1802, he assured them that they need not fear; that the free exercise of religion would never be interfered with by the federal government. As he explained:

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God; that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of government reach actions only and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.

So clearly did Jefferson understand the Source of America’s inalienable rights that he even doubted whether America could survive if we ever lost that knowledge. He queried:

And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure if we have lost the only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath?

Jefferson believed that God, not government, was the Author and Source of our rights and that the government, therefore, was to be prevented from interference with those rights. Very simply, the “fence” of the Webster letter and the “wall” of the Danbury letter were not to limit religious activities in public; rather they were to limit the power of the government to prohibit or interfere with those expressions.

Earlier courts long understood Jefferson’s intent. In fact, when Jefferson’s letter was invoked by the Supreme Court (only twice prior to the 1947 Everson case – the Reynolds v. United States case in 1878), unlike today’s Courts which publish only his eight-word separation phrase, that earlier Court published Jefferson’s entire letter and then concluded:

Coming as this does from an acknowledged leader of the advocates of the measure, it [Jefferson's letter] may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the Amendment thus secured. Congress was deprived of all legislative power over mere [religious] opinion, but was left free to reach actions which were in violation of social duties or subversive of good order. (emphasis added)

That Court then summarized Jefferson’s intent for “separation of church and state”:

[T]he rightful purposes of civil government are for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order. In th[is] . . . is found the true distinction between what properly belongs to the church and what to the State.

Actions into which – if perpetrated in the name of religion – the government did have legitimate reason to intrude. Those activities included human sacrifice, polygamy, bigamy, concubinage, incest, infanticide, parricide, advocation and promotion of immorality, etc.

Such acts, even if perpetrated in the name of religion, would be stopped by the government since, as the Court had explained, they were “subversive of good order” and were “overt acts against peace.”

However, the government was never to interfere with traditional religious practices outlined in “the Books of the Law and the Gospel” – whether public prayer, the use of the Scriptures, public acknowledgements of God, etc.

If Jefferson’s letter were used in 1947, letting its context be clearly given – as in previous years, it would never have been written into law.

Earlier Courts had always viewed Jefferson’s Danbury letter for just what it was: a personal, private letter to a specific group.

There is probably no other instance in America’s history where words spoken by a single individual in a private letter – words clearly divorced from their context – have become the sole authorization for a national policy.

Finally, Jefferson’s Danbury letter should never be invoked as a stand-alone document. A proper analysis of Jefferson’s views must include his numerous other statements on the First Amendment.

[N]o power over the freedom of religion . . . [is] delegated to the United States by the Constitution. — Kentucky Resolution, 1798

In matters of religion, I have considered that its free exercise is placed by the Constitution independent of the powers of the general [federal] government.–  Second Inaugural Address, 1805

[O]ur excellent Constitution . . . has not placed our religious rights under the power of any public functionary. — Letter to the Methodist Episcopal Church, 1808

I consider the government of the United States as interdicted [prohibited] by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions . . . or exercises. — Letter to Samuel Millar, 1808

Jefferson believed that the government was to be powerless to interfere with religious expressions for a very simple reason: he had long witnessed the unhealthy tendency of government to encroach upon the free exercise of religion.

In addition to his other statements previously noted, Jefferson also declared that the “power to prescribe any religious exercise. . . . must rest with the States” (emphasis added).

Nevertheless, the federal courts ignore this succinct declaration and choose rather to misuse his separation phrase to strike down scores of State laws which encourage or facilitate public religious expressions.

Such rulings against State laws are a direct violation of the words and intent of the very one from whom the courts claim to derive their policy.

The Congressional Records from June 7 to September 25, 1789, record the months of discussions and debates of the ninety Founding Fathers who framed the First Amendment.

Significantly, not only was Thomas Jefferson not one of those ninety who framed the First Amendment, but also, during those debates not one of those ninety Framers ever mentioned the phrase “separation of church and state.”

It seems logical that if this had been the intent for the First Amendment – as is so frequently asserted-then at least one of those ninety who framed the Amendment would have mentioned that phrase; none did.

The “separation” phrase so frequently invoked today was rarely mentioned by any of the Founders; and even Jefferson’s explanation of his phrase is diametrically opposed to the manner in which courts apply it today.

“Separation of church and state” was passed simply because they were allowed to re-define the phrase, and was unopposed.

If the bill were challenged today, arguing the full context as was argued in previous challenges before the 1947 law, it would easily be revoked.

Why is it that a law that has been so damaging to the Christian faith, and used to destroy the moral values of our nation, why has it not been challenged?” Why?

Excerpts were taken from: Wallbuilders

The progressive movement of the “new tolerance” poses a grave danger to you and your family, and our nation.

The Webster’s dictionary defines tolerance as, “to recognize and respect [others’ beliefs, practices, etc.] without sharing them,” and “to bear or put up with [someone or something not especially liked.”]

The new tolerance is defined, and taught to our children, as the view that all values, beliefs, lifestyles, and truth claims are equal — that what every individual believes or says is equally right, and equally valid.

But our moral values come from the teaching of the Bible, and traditionally, most of our laws. And the Bible makes it clear that all values, beliefs, lifestyles, and truth claims are not equal.

Often times a child that has been raised in a typically moral traditional family may return home from college one day and explain to their parents, “you don’t understand. My generation is different from your generation.

My generation is more tolerant. They say, ‘Let people live the way they want to live.’ We decide our own personal right and wrong, and leave everybody else alone.”

Nearly four in five eighteen – to thirty-four-year-olds admit to adopting that unbibical view, because of the indoctrination they receive in most of our educational system today.

There was a time when indoctrination started at the college level, but today the Progressives have gained control in many of our schools starting in kindergarten.

The new tolerance, respecting me means accepting and approving my ideals . . . because “what I believe represents who I am.”

In other words, if you don’t respect my values, my beliefs, my claim to truth, my lifestyle, as much as you do your own, then you are intolerant because you’re making a value judgment on my beliefs . . . and that. . .  according to the new tolerance, is a judgment of me as a person.

If there is no absolute moral standard, then one can’t say in a final sense that anything is right or wrong.

It’s ironic that the “New Tolerance Movement’ is intolerant of anyone that refuses to adopt their definition of tolerance.

The definition of the new tolerance means not only accepting a person who differs from you but also agreeing with, approving, and even participating in that person’s beliefs, behaviors, and lifestyle.

Drawing such false equations is one of the primary tactics of the new tolerance, labeling of any disagreement or objection as “phobic.”

When you complain that your elementary school son is too young to understand homosexuality, they won’t listen, they just call you names – You’re a “homophobe.”

If you protest the teaching of the Islamic faith to your child, where they are forced to pray to Allah, you are labeled an “islamaphobe.”

When was the last time you heard a member of the mainstream media call a progressive a “Christianophobe?”

Any nonconformity to their beliefs is labeled a “hate”.

In today’s climate of new tolerance, if you and your loved ones display strong Christian convictions, your convictions will expose you as “fanatics.”

The designation of Christian creeds, prayers, symbols, and similar expressions of faith is “discriminatory.”

A generation ago or more, schools focused on teaching our children reading, writing and arithmetic. Also to respect God, family, and country, to work hard and understand that we are all accountable for our actions.

The schools have been taken over by the Progressives and turned into “institutions of indoctrination” and used to reverse all of those virtues. I’m sorry that this generation has had that stolen from them.

Today, one of the primary goals of many educators – at the primary, secondary, and college levels – is to teach and promote the new tolerance.

The teaching of the new tolerance is corrupting the nations moral standards.

Immorality such as, acceptance of child bearing out of wedlock, was the beginning of the destruction of America. And today acceptance of gay marriage is adding to that destruction.

When we break down the traditional family unit we destroy our society.

When more than 50% of our daughters have no husbands, this breeds poverty.

Poverty brings more immorality, ignorance, lack of education, and the loss of accountability.

Many preachers, instead of leading their congregations to approach the unwed mothers and fathers and teaching them accountability, along with mentoring them and helping them financially – they allowed the secular activist of their time, and their emotion of love for their people, to deceive them into leading their flock in the ways of the world.

Giving material possessions precedence over the teaching of the Word of God, and eagerly sent them to the polls to vote for candidates that were against the teaching of the Bible, but promised to give them free food and housing.

This brought us a society weak in moral standards, content to accept abortion, homosexuality and separation of God from our schools and civil affairs, as a trade off for material and financial security, and because of it the generations that followed, have and will continue to suffer.

If we are to retrieve our nation we must do three things.

FIRST: We must gain control of our educational system. It would take one election cycle to gain control of the school boards across the nation. Most people don’t vote in school board elections.

If the local churches would organize in each district – and submit for the office of school board, conservative people – then promote them – and finally, get the church members to vote for them — they would soon be in control of the school system in their local area — and could return our schools back to their original intent.

Simple solution, but someone has to organize a national movement.

SECOND: We must actively nominate and vote politicians into office at all levels that will enact legislation that promotes moral policies. – And let the politicians that are there now hear our concerns.

THIRD: The churches must understand their responsibility of involvement in the political process. You can clear a church in less than a minute if you say the word politics.

Fifty percent of Christians voted for President Obama. Shameful.

But most church members and their leaders avoid politics because they have allowed the “new tolerance” movement to influence their activity through intimidation.

I would like to encourage you to join the “Media Flash Mob” team today.

If you have time to spend 15 minutes or more a day on social networking – Then I promise you, I can make it easy for you to make a difference using less time. — Maybe once or twice a week.

Look to your left and up a little, add your name and email address in the box provided, and get updates and alerts on critical issues. OR CLICK HERE

Your email address will not be shared with anyone.

Be sure to “click link” when you receive your “confirmation” email. This will finish your enrollment– this is to prevent spam.

You can opt out at any time.



For years I’ve labeled liberal politicians and their partners in the media as a bunch of sleazy Bookers.

It was kind of an inside joke between myself and my son when he was alive.

We surmised that some Democratic Politician must have at one time been one of these sleazy bookers and introduced the tactic to their party.

THE BOOKER TACTIC:  In the early 1980’s I wrote scripts and rebuttal tactics, for a group of telemarketers – Scripts which basically painted “pretty pictures” with words. – A tactic which liberals have learned to use to create “talking points” and “catch phrases”

This group of telemarketers then used this script to sell hundreds of thousands of books.

This was simply an advertising promotion where the merchant would offer a certificate redeemable for a gift or service “absolutely free”.

So, for the price of a free meal (about $2 cost to the merchant) the merchant could bring in a new customer where they could showoff their great food and friendly service in hopes that they would return as a regular customer. – And their advertising didn’t cost them anything unless or until the customer came into their establishment.

This was actually a great advertising promotion. — However, very quickly the business was overcome by dishonest con artist that sneaked into cities, misrepresented the products, made promises that weren’t there, and in a few short weeks sold thousands of books and then sneaked out town, on their way to another city.

Of course this ruined the promotion in a short time and it soon came to an end. – But a lot of dishonest people got rich.

There were two parts to their tactics that made the promotion successful.

First was the ability to tell a story basically made up of catch phrases that touched the emotions of potential buyers. That would benefit them, and convince them that they couldn’t do without this book of 150 certificates worth $2500 in free gifts and services for only a $49.95 distribution fee.

Free pizza delivered to your house – free haircuts and shampoos for the ladies – free dry cleaning. And even a free oil change for the man of the house.

The phrases “isn’t that great” and “absolutely free” were drummed into the conversation.

Can anyone say, “free food stamps”, “free housing”, “free Obama phones”?

Have you ever heard a Republican explain conservative policies in detail, in a way that would convince a voter to understand how it would benefit them?

This story was than distributed through the phone operators until that city had become saturated.

Using the “right words” to describe the product, plus “saturation” — was the key to success.

Changing public opinion is as uncomplicated as using the “booker” tactic. – Basically using the “right words” to make voters desire the conservative policies – and then  “saturate” the minds of the voters with talking points and catch phrases to support them.

And unlike the Progressives, it can be done without lies and deception. Most Conservative policies have the answers to the nations problems but it’s not being explained (pretty pictures) in a way that will change public opinion.

Our society has been so dumbed down that a great many voters today only understand what is presented “simply” and triggers their “emotions”. – And then, they only get it when their minds have been saturated with it.  (Rush has named them “low information voters”)

The progressives have used this tactic successfully for years resulting in “elections won”.

They have the advantage of the corrupt main-stream news media, and are well organized, coordinating their talking points and catch phrases. – They know how to sell their product by touching the voters emotions and appealing to their comfort level.

If someone is beating you year after year, you would think it might be advantageous to analyze their tactics and learn to adopt some of their methods.

So! How do Conservatives overcome the power of the corrupt main-stream news media?

I’m glad you ask.

The Tea Party caucus, or a group of conservatives, or the RNC should select a “brainstorming committee” that determines “Talking points for each week”, based on the current events. — One that supports the message they want to convey concerning those events.

This week alone has presented several opportunities. Benghazi, the IRS targeting conservative groups, and the gang of 8, immigration reform debacle.

The liberals and some establishment Republicans will try to convince conservatives that they will be seen as mean spirited, accusing them of politicizing the issues.

That’s what politicians do. Politicize the issues in an attempt to sway voters. – It works. The liberals have mastered it brilliantly.

These talking points and catch phrases would then be sent to each conservative congressman so that they will all be on the same page, understanding the promotion for that time period.

The “brainstorming committee” that determines the “Talking points for each week”, should then schedule a select group of spokesmen to appear on as many national TV and radio stations as possible, particularly the liberal ones, being careful that each one use the same talking points, and catch phrases.

Those that can’t appear on national shows should try to get on their local stations.

The national liberal mainstream news media may reject their offer, but the local stations will stand on their heads to get them. So the politicians in each state should attempt to schedule interviews with them.

They got the memo, they know what the plan is.

This would provide them with an opportunity to reach the liberal audience.

Participants will realize the advantages of “face and name recognition” when the elections come around. Many low information voters only vote for names and faces that are familiar to them.

Messaging through the airwaves would save millions in advertising cost.

By coordinating the “talking points”, the people in Texas will be hearing the same  “talking points” as the people in Ohio. And the same as on the national stations.

And this tactic CAN overwhelm the liberal press.

If conservatives can overwhelm the public and change public opinion, they can eliminate any power that the liberals now have.

But mostly Republicans just don’t know how to campaign. – I’ll write on that subject in more detail at a later date.

Candidates continue to spend millions on the same tired old advisors that insist they campaign moderately, convinced that this will bring the independent voters to their side.  – Always playing to “not lose” instead of just explaining the benefits of conservatism.

And the game has changed. It’s the low information voter that determines who wins or loses.

You find them in all groups: College students, women, minority, seniors, Christians, and welfare recipients.

The low information voter is bored with politics, and long drawn out conversations won’t hold their attention. They don’t want to be bothered, and they don’t care about what is going on in the world.

But they still vote.

So you have to secure their vote using short bites that appeals to their comfort level. And teaches them how to vote.

Someone in the Republican leadership must be willing to step up and organize a “hit group” that can devise catch phrases that touches the comfort level of the low information voter.

And then understand how to overcome the mainstream news media, and saturate their minds so that when the voters get to the polls they believe that unemployment IS 15% because of Democratic policies.

Or that gas IS $4 a gallon, because of Democratic policies.

Or that food stamps don’t stretch as far as they once did because of Democratic policies.

If the conservatives don’t pull themselves out of the stone ages and adopt these modern day tactics they will soon become ineffective and irrelevant.

If we allow the gang of 8 immigration reform Bill to become law, the Republican Party will cease to exist.

So I’ve decided to share an example of one of the recent Flash Mob Alerts and Call to Action emails that was sent to the “FLASH MOB WARRIORS IN ACTION TEAM.”

This may also assist those of you that would like to start your own opt in list, through this example. Especially the phone call script that is included.

You’re certainly welcome to copy this script to your own opt in list (or use it as a guideline) and encourage your members to join this attempt to stop this critical mistake that is being promoted by the gang of 8.

So this article has a duel purpose.

If you are new to this site . . . To understand this call to action you will need to review  “Immigration: Closing the Border”



Flash Mob Alert and Call to Action – Close the Border

I want to thank you again for joining the Media Flash Mob team of warriors.

We’re just getting started and new warriors are joining us every day.

With your participation the politicians will soon know us and that we are a group to be reckoned with.

You may want to share this email with your email list and encourage them to make contacts also. – And maybe join our team.

I always find myself skeptical when a handful of politicians go behind closed doors and negotiate deals in secret.

I don’t know why any conservative politician would consider any kind of immigration reform until the border is closed and secure.

They could then take the time necessary to put a plan together that will draw the Hispanic vote to the Republican Party.

Some Republicans, including Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, have already expressed concerns.

“It’s worse than we thought. It’s amnesty on a massive scale, greater than we anticipated,” Smith told Politico, adding, “We took their word that the border was going to be secured before the other reforms were implemented and that’s not the case.”

If they pass this bill as it stands they will guarantee an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states they now win easily.

RESEARCH DATA: Report: Immigration ‘reform’ bonanza for Democrats (POLITICO) The immigration proposal pending in Congress would transform the nation’s political landscape for a generation or more — pumping as many as 11 million new Hispanic voters into the electorate a decade from now in ways that, if current trends hold, would produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states they now win easily.

Wavers and exceptions are put into the bill allowing the senior executives to find ways to get around the laws.

RESEARCH DATA: Immigration bill contains 400 waivers, exceptions and exemptions –The bill’s complexity is forcing opponents and supporters to comb through its 844 pages before they can declare their conditional support or opposition to the high-stakes measure.

This bill is written to allow the senior procurement executive for the agency conducting the procurement … to determine that the waiver or modification is necessary.”

“Except” appears 156 times in the document.

EXAMPLE.—The Secretary, in the Secretary’s sole and unreviewable discretion, may waive the application (A) on behalf of an alien,” says one passage on page 71 of the complex document.

The gang of 8 are putting together a power play in a effort to force the bill through the House

RESEARCH DATA: Gang of 8 plots path to Senate super majority— (POLITICO) Senate immigration negotiators are targeting as many as two dozen Republicans for a show-of-force majority — which they believe may be the only way a reform bill will have the momentum to force the House to act.

Following are the numbers for the four Republican members in the gang of 8.

I would like to encourage you to call these numbers over the next two days at your convenience.

Sen. Marcio Rubio (R-Fla.) — (202) 224-3041
Sen. Jeff Flake(R-Ariz.) — (202) 224-4521
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) — (202) 224-2235
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — (202) 224-5972

If you’re feel strong about this issue and have the time, you may also want to contact your personal Senators and Congressmen



Following is a script to assist you.

Hello my name is ___________________. I’m calling in behalf of the Media Flash Mob Action Group.

Is Congressman (Senator)__________________ available to speak to me? (He probably won’t be)

Well I would like to leave a message. Who can I speak to?

We believe that Immigration reform is necessary and are pleased that it is on the table.

But ya know, “We took the word of the gang of 8, that the border was going to be secured before the other reforms were implemented and that doesn’t seem to be the case.”

We don’t favor any kind of immigration reform until the border is closed and secure.

We believe that would give them the time necessary to put a plan together that will draw the Hispanic vote to the Republican Party.

And we think we have a plan that would close the border in a few months, at a low cost, and could be maintained without adding any extra payroll.

If you’re in front of a computer I can save you some time. — Are you? Great.

Now if you will go to MediaFlashMob.com. – That’s M-e-d-i-a Flash Mob –  I’ll wait.

Now go to your far left and scroll down to the box that says “Categories”. – Let me know when you get there.

Got it? Great. – Now click on “immigration” and scroll down to the second post – It should read: “Immigration: Closing the Border”

That’s our plan, and I believe that Senator ____________________, once he reads it, will agree that it’s simple, quick to implement, would be economical and would even help the economy –

And this plan would be so hard to reject that it would present a great negotiating chip to present a bill that would close the border first. –

And then work on a second bill to deal with the immigrants that are already here.  

Will you make sure Senator__________________ Gets this message?

I would like for (Senator)__________________ to return my call and tell me what he intends to do. Can I leave my number?

I usually offer my email address too.

If I don’t hear from him in a few days I’ll probably call back. OK.

Well thanks, you’ve been very kind. Have a great day.

If they return your call it will give you an opportunity to encourage the politicians to organize and learn the Flash Mob tactics and encourage them to check out MediaFlashMob.com

I am so grateful for your dedication.

We WILL make a difference

Thanks again,
Ray Turner



When you read this complete article it may seem like it would take a lot of time to participate.

But if you accept the research material, and read the script only it would take less than ten minutes for each call.

In this particular call to action, I presented several numbers because of the four Senators involvement. I would generally present only one number plus the link to contact your personal State Congressman.

This script also allows you to protest the closing of the border only, if you don’t feel comfortable to push the issue.  (Just simply eliminate the part of the script that is printed in Red)

I would like to encourage you to join the “Media Flash Mob” team today.

If you have time to spend 15 minutes or more a day on social networking – Then I promise you, I can make it easy for you to make a difference using less time. — Maybe once or twice a week.

Look to your left in the sidebar, add your name and email address in the box provided, and get updates and alerts on critical issues. OR CLICK HERE

Your email address will not be shared with anyone.

Be sure to “click link” when you receive your “confirmation” email.

This will finish your enrollment– this is to prevent spam.

You can opt out at any time.

Related Article:

If This Article Doesn’t Encourage You to Get Involved, Then You May be Part of The Problem.